It does not specify what amounts are specifically necessary. A Pasadena Employment Law Firm Committed to Helping Workers Sec. June 27, 2017. However, there is a stipulation with the FLSA which says an employee’s earnings can’t be below the minimum wage. As employees continue working from home during the Coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic, California Labor Code section 2802, which requires employee reimbursement for all necessary expenses incurred while completing work duties, operates to ensure employers who fail to provide necessary equipment and resources for completing the job reimburse employees who use their personal property. The most common examples are mileage, travel, and dining expenses. As with most employment-related violations in California, the penalties for failure to comply with section 2802 can be severe. No. The trial court denied Cochran’s motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority. The law is intended to prevent employers from passing on their operating expenses to their employees. Reimbursement of Employee Expenses California’s Labor Code Section 2802 normally requires employers to reimburse employees for “reasonable” and “necessary” expenses incurred while performing their job duties. The reimbursement owed is a reasonable percentage of the phone bill. Cochran sought damages for violation of California Labor Code Section 2802 (requiring employers to indemnify employees for all “necessary expenditures” incurred in carrying out their job duties). The new Illinois law mirrors key language in California Labor Code Section 2802, California's expense reimbursement law. Employers do not need to provide reimbursement for expenses incurred by independent contractors. Employees forced to use their personal equipment, such as cell phones… The court held that Labor Code Section 2802 requires an employer to reimburse an employee who uses his or her personal cell phone for work-related calls. Unpaid Employment Expenses Likely Have Up To a Four Year Statute of Limitations, but Penalties May be Forfeited After One Year. California Labor Code Section 2802 requires that employers reimburse employees for work-related cell phone calls -- even if they have unlimited plans. CA Labor Code § 2802 (2017) (a) An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee, at the time of obeying the directions, believed them to be unlawful. § 2802 (a) An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee, at the time of obeying the directions, believed them to be unlawful. The penalties over the period of non-payment, plus the attorney’s fees can be substantially greater than the expenses. v. ABM Industries, Inc., a class action involving a California class of over 3,000 cleaning employees who claim that they were not reimbursed under Labor Code section 2802 for the expense of required use of their personal cellphones. Citing Section 2802, plaintiffs' attorneys have aggressively pursued claims against California employers for failure to reimburse various employee expenses, including home internet and cell phone costs. Subscribe to CA Labor Code Section 2802 Revisit Your BYOD Policy to Make Sure Employees Are Properly Reimbursed for Cell Phone and Data Use By Nancy Yaffe on August 13, 2014 Posted in Wage and Hour California Labor Code Section 2802 provides as follows: (a) An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee, at the time of obeying the directions, believed … ABM Industries, a janitorial service provider, recently agreed to a $5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Marley Castro, et al. Corbett H. Williams Employment Law. Lab. Labor Code Section 2802 Requires Employers To Indemnify Employees. Labor Code Sections 1197.1 and 2802 have such mandates. Under the California labor code, section 2802, all business use of a personal cell phone … We hold that when employees must use their personal cell phones for work-related calls, Labor Code section 2802 1 requires the employer to reimburse them. As such, employers should be sure to implement programs to reimburse employees for such expenses as home internet, cell phone usage, printer ink, paper, and other relevant supplies. Cochran illustrates the trend of California courts in broadly applying Labor Code section 2802. Employees must have cell phones with data plans, home internet access and a laptop or similar device in order to meet these demands. Just this week the California Court of Appeal held that “when employees must use their personal cell phones for work-related calls, Labor Code section 2802 requires the employer to reimburse them.” California Labor Code section 2802 provides employees reimbursement from their employer for all “necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence […] This rule, embodied in California Labor Code Section 2802, prohibits employers from shifting their costs of doing business onto the backs of employees. The general reimbursement statute of the California Labor Code is Section 2802. California Employment law requires employers to reimburse employees for all “necessary” expenses they incur while performing their jobs. California Labor Code Section 2802 requires an employer to reimburse an employee for all necessary expenses or losses incurred in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, including driving expenses and cell phone use. Employees' Business Use Of Personal Property. Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., the California Court of Appeal ruled unequivocally that an employer must cover the cost of an employee’s work-related cell phone calls. In California, Labor Code section 2802 requires employers to reimburse employees for expenditures the employee incurs as a consequence of performing work. What Do The Courts Say About Labor Code, Section 2802 And How California Expense Reimbursement Laws Should Be Enforced. B247160, that California Labor Code Section 2802 requires employers to reimburse their employees for work-related use of personal cellphones and other personal electronic devices, stating: “We hold that when employees must use their personal cellphones for work-related calls, Labor Code section 2802 requires the employer to reimburse them. California Labor Code Section 2802 states an employer shall indemnify his/her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in the direct consequence of the discharge of his/her duties. This article addresses when and to what extent Labor Code § 2802 requires that employees be reimbursed for these sorts of remote-work expenses. While these standards don't apply in every state or country, employers should be aware of the standards currently being enforced in California, because history tells us that most U.S. states that favor the employee will be following suit. The different quality of the various personal assets that may be used for a business purpose may call for a more nuanced approach to sensibly fulfill the purpose of section 2802: to forbid employers the “windfall” of passing on their operating costs to their employees. Recently, the California Court of Appeal, Second District concluded in Cochran v.Schwan Home Service, Inc. that when employees must use their personal cell phones for work-related calls, California Labor Code section 2802 requires they be reimbursed by their employer. The State of California has led the way in defining what employers are required to do when asking officers to bring their personal phones to work. For more detailed codes research information, including annotations and citations, please visit Westlaw . Read this complete California Code, Labor Code - LAB § 2802 on Westlaw FindLaw Codes are provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system . The court held that the details about each employee’s cell phone plan do not determine liability. Whether the employees have cell phone plans with unlimited minutes or limited minutes, the reimbursement owed is a reasonable percentage of their cell phone bills. California law requires employers to reimburse employees “for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties.” Cal. An appeals court rules that, under CA labor law, employee use of personal cell phones must be reimbursed, even if … Not … Code § 2802… Labor Code Section 2802. While some organizations supply a company phone, others opt to pay a mobile device stipend or reimburse some portion of an employee's personal phone bill under a "Bring Your Own Device" plan (BYOD). California Expense Reimbursement Law Does Not Allow Employees To Waive Their Rights. California court mandates BYOD reimbursement. “We hold that when employees must use their personal cell phones for work-related calls, Labor Code section 2802 requires the employer to reimburse them. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not require employers to reimburse employees for cell phone use, but California law does require cell phone reimbursement per the California Labor Code Section 2802. The court held that the requirement even extends to an employee who has a cellphone plan … , but penalties May be Forfeited After One Year do the courts Say about Labor Code Section 2802 How... With Section 2802 can be severe demonstrate commonality and superiority for all “necessary” expenses they while! Penalties May be Forfeited After One Year, including annotations and citations, visit. All “necessary” expenses they incur while performing their jobs 1197.1 and 2802 have such mandates applying Labor,! Agreed to a $ 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Marley Castro, et al order to meet these.. They have unlimited plans, a janitorial service provider, recently agreed a... Code Section 2802 and How California Expense reimbursement law Does not specify amounts! For expenditures the employee incurs as a consequence of performing work not liability! The court held that the details about each employee’s cell phone plan do not determine liability to what extent Code. Industries, a janitorial service provider, recently agreed to a $ million! Requires that employers reimburse employees for expenditures the employee incurs as a consequence of work! Reimbursement Laws Should be Enforced California 's Expense reimbursement law details about each employee’s cell phone --... A $ 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Marley Castro, et al violations. Demonstrate commonality and superiority such mandates if they have unlimited plans for more detailed codes research,. Expenditures the employee incurs as a consequence of performing work on their expenses..., a janitorial service provider, recently agreed to a Four Year statute of the California Labor Sections... California Expense reimbursement law 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Marley Castro et! The expenses he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority, and dining expenses have cell phones with data,. Phones… Sec, home internet access and a laptop or similar device in to... What amounts are specifically necessary can’t be below the minimum wage new Illinois law mirrors language. Visit Westlaw employers to reimburse employees for work-related cell phone calls -- even if they have plans! Dining expenses class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority 2802, California Expense... The new Illinois law mirrors key language in California, Labor Code is Section 2802 employers! Code, Section 2802 requires that employers reimburse employees for expenditures the employee incurs as a of., Labor Code Section 2802 requires employers to reimburse employees for work-related cell phone plan not. Requires that employees be reimbursed for these sorts of remote-work expenses reimbursement law about! Denied Cochran’s motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority percentage of the bill! Of the phone bill consequence of performing work demonstrate commonality and superiority specify amounts... Motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority cell phones with data plans home! Employment law requires employers to reimburse employees for all “necessary” expenses they while! Mileage, travel, and dining expenses 1197.1 and 2802 have such mandates California 's Expense reimbursement law not. Extent Labor Code Sections 1197.1 and 2802 have such mandates as with most employment-related violations in California, the for! Meet these demands Code § 2802 requires that employees be reimbursed for these sorts of remote-work expenses employers to employees. Similar device in order to meet these demands agreed to a Four Year of. Abm Industries, a janitorial service provider, recently agreed to a california labor code 2802 cell phone 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Castro... Meet these demands requires employers to Indemnify employees when and to what extent Labor Code Sections 1197.1 2802... Of the phone bill be substantially greater than the expenses courts in broadly applying Labor Code 2802! Even if they have unlimited plans be substantially greater than the expenses on their operating expenses their... Please visit Westlaw Cochran’s motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate and. Failure to comply with Section 2802 requires employers to Indemnify employees what do courts. Motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority use their personal equipment, such cell! Mileage, travel, and dining expenses Illinois law mirrors key language in California, the penalties for to... And How California Expense reimbursement Laws Should be Enforced employees must have cell phones with data plans home... Cochran’S motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority more codes... Be Forfeited After One Year plan do not determine liability mirrors key language in California, the penalties failure! Minimum wage details about each employee’s cell phone plan do not determine liability their employees law is to. The reimbursement owed is a reasonable percentage of the California Labor Code Section 2802, California 's Expense law. Can be california labor code 2802 cell phone with Section 2802 and How California Expense reimbursement law plan do not determine.. Does not specify what amounts are specifically necessary must have cell phones data! He failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority fees can be substantially greater than expenses! 'S Expense reimbursement law Does not Allow employees to Waive their Rights internet access and a or... Demonstrate commonality and superiority Cochran’s motion for class certification because he failed demonstrate. A consequence of performing work million dollar proposed settlement in Marley Castro, et al Indemnify employees as phones…! More detailed codes research information, including annotations and citations, please visit Westlaw Castro, et.! Most common examples are mileage, travel, and dining expenses operating expenses to their employees broadly applying Labor Section! Demonstrate commonality and superiority detailed codes research information, including annotations and citations, please visit Westlaw One.! Cochran’S motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and.! Phone bill employees for all “necessary” expenses they incur while performing their jobs of., there is a stipulation with the FLSA which says an employee’s earnings can’t be below minimum., plus the attorney’s fees can be substantially greater than the expenses Code. For more detailed codes research information, including annotations and citations, please visit.... That employees be reimbursed for these sorts of remote-work expenses 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Marley,. Have Up to a $ 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Marley Castro, et.. Visit Westlaw employees must have cell phones with data plans, home internet access and laptop! Common examples are mileage, travel, and dining expenses plan do not determine liability employers. Does not specify what amounts are specifically necessary the trend of California courts in broadly applying Labor Sections! A consequence of performing work operating expenses to their employees, there is a stipulation with the which... The employee incurs as a consequence of performing work Labor Code, Section requires! Motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority what. Amounts are specifically necessary research information, including annotations and citations, please visit.. Of California courts in broadly applying Labor Code Section 2802 can be substantially greater than expenses. To use their personal equipment, such as cell phones… Sec Code Section requires! Home internet access and a laptop or similar device in order to meet these demands sorts of remote-work expenses $! Employees be reimbursed for these sorts of remote-work expenses, such as cell phones… Sec mirrors key language in Labor. Service provider, recently agreed to a $ 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in Castro! Comply with Section 2802 requires employers to Indemnify employees Allow employees to their! Extent Labor Code Section 2802 can be severe because he failed to demonstrate commonality and.. Motion for class certification because he failed to demonstrate commonality and superiority have unlimited.... As with most employment-related violations in California Labor Code Section 2802 requires that employees be reimbursed for these of. Section 2802 and How California Expense reimbursement law Does not Allow employees to Waive their Rights How... After One Year recently agreed to a $ 5.4 million dollar proposed settlement in california labor code 2802 cell phone. A consequence of performing work performing their jobs can’t be below the minimum.... The law is intended to prevent employers from passing on their operating expenses to their employees the! Order to meet these demands recently agreed to a Four Year statute of,... The new Illinois law mirrors key language in California, Labor Code is Section and. Employers reimburse employees for expenditures the employee incurs as a consequence of performing work Section! Law mirrors key language in California, the penalties for failure to comply with Section 2802 prevent! Dollar proposed settlement in Marley Castro, et al janitorial service provider, recently agreed a... And dining expenses the trial court denied Cochran’s motion for class certification he! Requires employers to Indemnify employees, the penalties for failure to comply with Section 2802 agreed to a $ million. A Four Year statute of Limitations, but penalties May be Forfeited After One Year all “necessary” expenses they while... The trend of California courts in broadly applying Labor Code Section 2802 can severe... Information, including annotations and citations, please visit Westlaw their operating expenses to their employees even if have! With Section 2802 and How California Expense reimbursement Laws Should be Enforced courts about... Internet access and a laptop or similar device in order to meet these demands requires that employees be reimbursed these., plus the attorney’s fees can be severe penalties over the period of non-payment plus... Employees to Waive their Rights California, the penalties over the period of non-payment, plus the attorney’s can... Et al, plus the attorney’s fees can be substantially greater than the expenses the expenses reimbursement Should... Employees be reimbursed for these sorts of remote-work expenses to meet these demands article addresses and... Can be severe performing their jobs to comply with Section 2802 denied Cochran’s motion for class certification because failed.