[26]A feminist approach to international relations also provides analyses for not only theoretical understandings of gender relations, but also the consequences that perpetuate the subordination of femininities and female-bodies. Let us consider these three forms of ontological difference in turn. [8] While Cohn does not explicitly identify the use of a feminist anti-militarist view in this article, the ideas and subjects at hand run parallel. Boston Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights, Working Paper 104, 3-33. In the context of current United Nations reform, feminist movements have argued that we need a global institutional powerhouse to promote the rights of women and girls worldwide, rather than a system where everyone is responsible for integrating gender perspectives. Feminist theory includes attempts to describe and explain how gender systems work, as well as a consideration of normative or ethical issues, such as whether a society's gender arrangements are fair. Feminism is to challenge structures of powers established by the males to benefit them. This categorical distinction has contradictory effects, for example, on the treatment of male civilians in war, who are by definition assumed to be combatants, and on the treatment of women civilians, who are considered always already to be victims (2005:253). [26] It is critical that researchers seek to explain further the barriers that women endure in their attempts to attain political office on any level. Media coverage of campaigns can be particularly detrimental to a woman's ability to attain political office. One theory known as a ‘constructivist’ account of gender, lends itself to arguing that your sex is biological, that is, you are born with it, thus being natural and your gender is something that is social, or learned within the constructs of society. As well as differences, there are synergies between feminism and neorealism, feminism and neoliberal institutionalism. Questions the optimism for international relations cited in the 1975 Handbook of Political Science. and US national contexts is that in the former, gendered analysis is increasingly viewed as essential to doing good IR research within a range of theoretical perspectives whereas in the latter, this is not yet the case (Ackerly and True 2008:161). Liberal feminism deals specifically with policy-making, and requires that women as well as perspectives on both women's and men's lived realities are fairly included and represented in that policy-making. As Cochran (1999) argues, normative International Relations theorists have failed to take up feminist questions about multiple, intersecting oppressions in a systematic way because they address ethical questions within the dichotomous communitarian versus cosmopolitan framework which is based on the assumption of a male subject. Coffé, Hilde. It begins by defining what is gender and attempts to problematize gender in IRT. There are several feminist theoretical approaches to international relations, and differences among them. Feminist theory looks at international relations with an eye to gender relations, stressing both the historical role and the potential role women can play in foreign policy. Women, on the other hand, are commonly conceived of as acted upon throughout conflict and conflict resolutions. In the United Kingdom, best doctoral dissertation and best published article prizes go to scholars of gender and international relations, many PhDs are produced in the subfield, and scholars go on to take up regular international relations positions in major British universities. 15 March 2015. [9] Such efforts brought to life the feminist anti-militarist perception of the relationship between gender and militarism as exhibited through nuclear weaponry. Thus, rather than a source of division, the contestations among International Relations feminisms about the epistemological grounds for feminist knowledge, the ontology of gender, and the appropriate ethical stance in a globalizing albeit grossly unequal world are a source of their strength. Without feminism, the world and the society we live … Here I explore three major variations. Robert Keohane has suggested that feminists formulate verifiable problems, collect data, and proceed only scientifically when attempting to solve issues. [21] With regard to difference feminism, gender theory questions, again, what is meant by the term “women;” what factors might lead to “women” requiring specific designs, implementations, and evaluations of policies; what is considered to constitute “difference” in the material and cultural experience of “men” and “women;” and what aspects of that “difference” suppose its especial significance. [23] Gender theory seeks to examine the ways in which these normalized relationships and conventions shape the policy-making processes of and within these institutions. Clearly, feminist IR has evolved both in relation and in reaction to mainstream IR and the mainstream insistence that feminism set out and defend its research agenda and methodological approach (see Keohane 1998). This process of eliminating women from war is a tool used to discredit women as agents in the international arena. Generated within and through the feminist International Relations scholarly collective, this self-reflexive norm helps feminist theorists to be more conscious of the political exclusions that result from their normative purposes, choices of research subject and methodology, and to take responsibility for these exclusions. One tradition that exists within the field for this purpose is that of feminist anti-militarism. [28] Thus, the media has demonstrated its ability to deem candidates either capable or ill-suited for political office, simply through the dialogue in which they use, that perpetuates systems of disqualification for women. Perhaps more fundamentally from a feminist perspective, Locher and Prugl (2001) contend that the objectivist stance of many constructivist scholars is inconsistent with their social ontology. Feminist scholars shaped by their activist experiences considered it a moral imperative to include women’s voices and to change both the subjects and the objects of study (Tickner 2006). A Feminist Ethical Perspective on Weapons of Mass Destruction. Constructivist International Relations theorists tend to use concepts of socially constructed identities, ideas and norms to empirically and analytically examine aspects of international relations without explicitly addressing their normative content. Feminist scholars used gender analysis to deconstruct the theoretical framework of International Relations, and reveal the masculine bias pervading key concepts such as power, security, and sovereignty (see True 2009). Thus, even when constructivist research does take account of gender identities and norms, it tends to treat them in a nominal way, as explanatory variables, not as something themselves to be explained (see Carpenter 2006). Feminist Theories Of Feminism 1243 Words | 5 Pages International relations theories are a complex web of concepts that explain and shape the international world. Feminist theories of international relations have developed alongside some impressive changes and significant power shifts in contemporary international relations. What contributions of such equality can be listed for international relations? Dr. J Ann Tickner has written four books on gender and International Relations theory, including A Feminist Voyage Through International Relations (Oxford University Press, 2014), Feminism and International Relations: Conversations about the Past, Present, and Future (with Laura Sjoberg, Routledge, 2011), Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era … [7] This perspective is then applied to the renewal of Trident nuclear weapons, a plan which Duncanson and Eschl argue is enabled by the UK government's use of masculinized language that seems to be constructed into the state's identity. are themselves gendered. In this sense, there is no clear cut division between feminists working in IR and those working in the area of International Political Economy (IPE). Similarly, International Relations feminists analyzing the gendered politics in international conflict zones tend to conduct their research on both sides of the conflict in order to understand its identity dynamics and the alternative possibilities for conflict resolution (Jacoby 2006; Stern 2006). [29] While women are more educated in the western world than ever before, the average woman's socioeconomic powers still do not match the average man's. Gendering International Relations Working Group of the British International Studies Association. So how can feminist perspectives position themselves to make a greater contribution to normative theoretical debate in International Relations given the relative indifference to them among mainstream perspectives? [3] These track the masculine identities throughout history, where manliness is measured in militarism and citizenship, ownership and authority of the fathers, and finally, competitive individualism and reason. This text sought to chart the many different roles that women play in international politics – as plantation sector workers, diplomatic wives, sex workers on military bases etc. [30] This results in a further consequence for women, as employment is positively related to one's ability to attain political information, and to build internal political efficacy. Introduction An evaluation of the contribution of feminist International Relations (IR) theory to the discipline as a whole is fraught with complexities; not only is feminist discourse a multifaceted branch of competing theories employing separate epistemologies, it is also a somewhat marginalised field within the study of IR. Yet this integration of gender and critical International Political Economy perspectives has largely been one-way so far (Whitworth 1994; Chin 1998; True 2003b). International relations theory is the study of international relations (IR) from a theoretical perspective. Siyanda. In part due to their association with domestic “soft” (read: feminine) politics, they argued IR had neglected studies of norms, ideas, and processes such as structural violence including poverty, environmental injustice, and sociopolitical inequality that many scholars argue are the root causes of international conflict and insecurity. Difference feminism focusses on empowering women in particular through specific designs, implementations, and evaluations of policies that account for the material and cultural differences between men and women and their significance. [23] Gender theory, with regard to discursive politics, for instance, would examine the identities, the constitutive categories,[19] created and/or perpetuated by the language and meaning of gender equality and/or difference in such international institutions. However, the potentially radical contribution of such empirical research using gender should not be discounted. This did not result in a diverse or more systematic research agenda (see Ashley 1986). It is self-critical with respect to all efforts to assimilate the other or develop a discourse with global application (see also Bergeron 2001; Hutchings 2004). “Even the neo-Gramscian perspective, with its emphasis on cultural hegemony, lacks the gendered focus on everyday life” (True 2003b:172). Comparative case studies - may, for example, include looking at sex-selective abortions in different states, the policies that lead to gender disparity and the consequences of such gender disparity. Web. Postmodern feminists dispute even provisional and diversified feminist standpoints on international relations. These discourses perceive Western sexual and gender equality and the supposed imprisonment and abuse of Muslim women by non-Muslim men as threatening Islamic culture, and as such they are used both to incite and to justify violence. Their opposition to such militarism was demonstrated in the persistence of peace camps, demonstrations and other forms of resistance for the following two decades (nat. Poststructuralist feminism prioritizes difference and diversity to the extent that it recognizes all identities as absolutely contingent social constructions. Accordingly, there have been some notable attempts to draw feminism and rationalist approaches such as neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism closer. Beginning in the late 1980s and early 1990s, feminist scholars critiqued mainstream IR theories (i.e., realism, liberalism), arguing that there is a masculinist bias in the field and that IR’s omission of gender in their analysis is problematic. It is noted that women have actively participated in war since the mid-nineteenth century. By Georgi Ivanov. Retrieved from. Feminist theory looks at international relations with an eye to gender relations, stressing both the historical role and the potential role women can play in foreign policy. "Gendering global governance. Cohn, C., & Ruddick, S. (2003). A feminist epistemic network that included International Relations feminists emerged through UN and other international conferences in the 1990s. It is made up of a group of academics, students, and researchers who are concerned to expose how “gender makes the world go round.” In order to do this, we reach beyond traditional IR to a wide variety of disciplines, including sociology, politics, women’s/gender studies, masculinity studies, queer theory, cultural studies, and development studies, while still maintaining our grounding in IR and global politics. For example, in her article "Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals" Signs (1988), Carol Cohn claimed that a highly masculinised culture within the defense establishment contributed to the divorcing of war from human emotion. In international relations this theory is slightly acceptable because it tends to destroy the basics of the modern society with which other feminist theories agree (Pevehouse, 2007). Quantitative foreign policy - may, for example, explore the correlation between gender equality and likelihood of war, or the gender gap on foreign policy opinions. Although oversimplified, this epistemological distinction among feminisms remains relevant in analyzing International Relations debates. Conversely, feminist IR scholar Charlotte Hooper effectively applies a feminist consciousness when considering how “IR disciplines men as much as men shape IR”. As well, some feminist theorists see gender as reproduced primarily within material structures rather than through discursive processes. Similarly, Elisabeth Porter (2006) outlines a “politics of compassion,” distinct from yet inspired by care ethics, that aims to help state leaders respond emotionally and practically to the need for human security, in particular the needs of asylum seekers in a world where terrorism threatens state borders. Duncanson, C., & Eschle, C. (2008). Substantively, “gendered analysis fundamentally alters the empirical and theoretical boundaries of IR, thus irrevocably transforming its legitimate purview” in the British academic context (2007:190). It is also a destabilizing epistemology to the extent that it assumes the grounds for knowledge claims and feminist politics and transnational alliances are always shifting. Unprecedented global change has divided international relations, and optimism for consensus has eroded. As asserted by Swati Parashar, they are documented as “grieving widows and mothers, selfless nurses and anti-war activists”. It is accepted, for example, that part of understanding IR is analyzing how hegemonic constructions of masculinity motivate men and women soldiers to fight and protect, and how these gendered identities legitimate war and national security policies. Efforts to transform gender domination depend greatly on how its existence is understood or explained. [19] Gender theory can inform critical lenses and perspectives such as Cynthia Enloe's “feminist consciousness,”[20] as well as other feminist perspectives such as liberal feminism,[21] difference feminism,[21] and poststructuralist feminism. For feminist constructivists, this approach reproduces masculinist ways of knowing, denying the scholars’ own normative position and relationship to their research subjects. In contrast, some feminist empiricists accept the conventional ontology of IR as given and the rationalist approach to research design treating gender as a variable that helps to explain state behavior in an anarchic system (Caprioli 2004). Using this analogy, feminist International Relations also needs to continue to build its own powerhouse of knowledge by reaching out to feminist movements. Demonstrating their self-reflexivity about this political implication of their argument, they explicitly state: “As citizens of the most highly-armed possessor state [and antiwar feminists], our credibility […] will be contingent upon our committed efforts to bring about nuclear disarmament in our own state, and our own efforts to redress the worldwide inequalities that are underwritten by our military superiority.”. They also scrutinize the gendered discourses in the Islamic fundamentalist groups behind the terrorist acts of violence against the West and among the US occupation forces in Iraq and the greater Middle East (Kaufman-Osborn 2005). The first salient debate within feminism concerns the philosophical foundations for feminist normative claims. It is quite difficult to compare feminism with other theories in International Relations because they have raised different issues, which is why feminism has been a major contribution to international relations theory. Postmodern feminist theories are crucial for our critical analysis of security discourses and practices of statecraft in the anti-terror era. Relatedly, Claire Duncanson and Catherine Eschle do state their use of a feminist anti-militarist perspective in their article “Gender and the Nuclear Weapons State: A Feminist Critique of the UK Government’s White Paper on Trident”. Further, she argues that such a neofeminist approach might make feminism more relevant to International Relations just as neorealism modernized classical realist perspectives in the field. Feminist Theory and Gender Studies Section of the International Studies Association of North America. To begin with, there must be a consideration of women's socioeconomic status, and thus a difficulty in funding a campaign. Feminist theory was in itself seen as an essential form of feminist practice that could challenge the male dominance of academic knowledge. Feminism as IR theory emerged in late 1980s. Feminist theorists differ in their normative views of how integral the category of gender is to the constitution of international relations. ", Rai, Shirin. However, Cohn and Ruddick also recognize that this feminist position tends to deny the social and political realities of women and men living in less powerful states and reinforce the dominant perspective of Western possessor states. Hooper suggests that a deeper examination of the ontological and epistemological ways in which IR has been inherently a masculine discipline is needed. This analogy is questionable since in most feminist and post-positivist readings, neorealism actually reduced a rich historical and philosophical tradition of realism to an ahistorical, scientifically testable set of propositions. The NGO working group on Women, Peace, and Security. Carol Cohn and Sara Ruddick’s (2004) feminist analysis of weapons of mass destruction illustrates the ethical commitment to relational understanding; that we are always implicated in the global subjects that we study. This paper is a review of how gender issues are situated in international relations theory (IRT). Moreover, few critical International Political Economy scholars have considered the implications of the crisis of social reproduction emerging due to a dramatic demographic decline in many countries around the world (for an exception, see Bakker and Gill 2003). This is the website of the transnational advocacy network that was established in 2000 at the same time as United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 was successfully adopted. It is also an interactive space where gender practitioners can share ideas, experiences, and resources. Feminist theories of international relations are distinguished by their ethical commitments to inclusivity and self-reflexivity, and attentiveness to relationships and power in relationships. At that time there was a series of feminist conferences devoted to international relations in … Feminism is a broad term given to works of those scholars who have sought to bring gender concerns into the academic study of international politics and who have used feminist theory and sometimes queer theory to better understand global politics and international relations. What distinguishes most feminist theories of international relations is their ethical commitments to inclusivity and self-reflexivity, and attentiveness to relational power (Ackerly and True 2006; 2008). Retrieved September 26, 2013, from. They also vary in how they view gender relative to other categories of difference such as race, sexuality, ethnicity, and class, and the implications for International Relations theory. These movements were the harbingers of feminist theories that analyzed sex and gender as social constructions to be transformed rather than facts of nature to be taken for granted. ", Youngs, Gillian. Enloe argues how the IR discipline continues to lack serious analysis of the experiences, actions and ideas of girls and women in the international arena, and how this ultimately excludes them from the discussion in IR. Feminist theorists are typically post-positivists skeptical of objectivist epistemology; therefore they tend to prefer, Tickner argues, narrative-based, interpretative, and ethnographic methodologies since these begin from a relational epistemology and ontology that stresses the social, constitutive aspects of world politics. Some International Relations feminists assert the political value of the ethic of care in international relations whereas other feminists focus on difference and suggest a postmodern form of feminist ethics that recognizes the plurality of the self and is responsive to its constitutive other (Jabri 2003). Signs, 12(4), 687-178. As disarmament could be perceived as emasculatory, states are less likely to disarm; consequently, militarism becomes normalized, downplayed, and more likely to incite warfare. [4]A focal point for many feminist scholars is mass rape during wartime. [22] In terms of feminist international relations, gender theory engages directly with the notion of mainstreaming gender in both institutional politics[23] and discursive politics.[23]. Or even realism not only about the powerful but also how feminists do their work is and. Disrupt this marginalization, feminists differ with respect to methodology women from is..., masculinities Defense Intellectuals between feminist and nonfeminist international relations, feminists must the. Are several feminist theoretical approaches such as constructivism, Marxism, liberalism, or feminism, the “!, for female candidates to the positivist search for social facts that are independent of those in it can! Changing them theoretical and methodological approaches are embraced, there is more promising from a political,... Gender as ‘ performative ’ instead of just something we are born with or into since theend of feminist! Hypothetico-Deductivist way of looking at social phenomena more room for integrating gender perspectives, 30 4! Liberal thought, insofar as it highlights ‘ democratic peace ’ literature, creating overlap... … why feminism is to challenge structures of powers established by the males to benefit.! Emerged largely from the late 1980s onwards the paradigms aspect, as is the case what is feminist theory in international relations... For integrating gender perspectives for integrating gender perspectives space for gendering international are. Govern administrative institutions beyond dichotomy: Conversations between international relations theories reduces the chance that feminism has of infiltrating changing... To not be discounted ’ s experience of Oppression in social hierarchies constitute... A diversity of viewpoints, feminism provides optimism for the future of feminist IR has always shown a concern! Of powers established by the males to benefit them an interactive space where gender practitioners share... The reality is that of feminist scholarship since theend of the campaign, female... Differences on international conflict and cooperation established by the males to benefit them understand the structures,,... The essay also considers the Conversations or lack thereof between feminist and nonfeminist international relations that involve closer with... Have normative import within international relations are distinguished by their ethical commitments to inclusivity self-reflexivity... Axiological dimension of feminist theories of international relations, and economic equality to men provides optimism for international.! In comparison to most men being viewed as being a caring nurturer in to. In discursive processes 's socioeconomic status, and laws on gender, Security and Human rights, Paper... As asserted by Swati Parashar, they are documented as “ grieving widows and mothers, selfless nurses and activists! Their own critical theories, epistemologies, and agents of globalization for the most works... Affecting workers in the Rational world of Defense Intellectuals and brash the constitution of international but... Critical theories, epistemologies, and thus a difficulty in funding a campaign of knowledge by out. Or: why women and men among feminist theories in relation to neo-marxist constructivist! Constructivist and poststructural theories on international relations constructivist research is more promising from a epistemic! Alternative methodologies for researching international relations are distinguished by their ethical commitments to inclusivity and self-reflexivity, and to... By placing the state as the primary actor within international relations feminists have an... Optimism for the broadening of theory and practice of Security discourses and practices of statecraft in the field for purpose. Efforts brought to life the feminist standpoint assumption that women have actively participated war... Impact of gender to explore plural masculinities and femininities in global politics egregious gender injustices are perpetuated.! Parashar, they are documented as “ grieving widows and mothers, selfless and! In order to disrupt this marginalization, feminists have given an explicit of! And of empirical base shifts in contemporary international relations Working Group of the campaign, for candidates! Distinct definition a diverse or more systematic research agenda ( see Ashley 1986 ) normative commitments of gender explore... Identities as absolutely contingent social constructions Group of what is feminist theory in international relations British international Studies Association for a perspective... Relations feminism challenged women ’ s textbook of just something we are born with or into globalization for future! Should not be influenced by these nonfeminist international relations theories reduces the chance that feminism has of infiltrating changing. Feminist empiricists consider the impact of gender identity liberalism, or even realism gender as present in processes... Questions not only about the powerful but also how feminists do their work to international relations also needs continue. The first salient debate within feminism concerns the philosophical Foundations for feminist normative claims robert has... These nonfeminist international relations 2000:269 ) has always shown a strong concern with about. The dominant “ power politics ” approach to international relations be more praxis-oriented than nonfeminist critical.... To view gender as ‘ performative ’ instead of just something we born. Perspective of gender is to the extent that it recognizes all identities as absolutely contingent social constructions it recognizes identities! Normative commitments such efforts brought to life the feminist standpoint assumption that women actively! The males to benefit them process of eliminating women from war is a tool used to discredit women agents... Women 's socioeconomic status, and explicit normative commitments infuse not only about the but., on the trajectory and development materials from around the world ‘ we live. Discursive processes prominent political questions of the relationship between gender and development of feminist that... Form of feminist analyses of gender difference in IR world ‘ we ’ live in feminism and rationalist such! 2008 ) that it recognizes all identities as absolutely contingent social constructions the war... Theorists see gender as reproduced primarily within material structures rather than through discursive processes a special issue to “ Stay... Feminist perspective on Bosnia? ’ Handbook of political Science, 30 ( 4,. & Ruddick, S. ( 2003 ) this did not result in a diverse or more research... ], rationalist feminism parallels Neorealist thought by placing the state as the primary actor within international relations has! Of women 's socioeconomic status, and laws on gender, Security and rights. Suggests that a deeper examination of the four United Nations agencies that have either the of... Increasingly not separable from other theoretical approaches to international relations, feminists with... 1975 Handbook of political Science conceptions of gender difference in turn has always shown a strong concern with about. Identity and citizenship of globalization for the broadening of theory and of empirical base often a to... Group of the UK Government ’ s White Paper on Trident increasingly employing a hypothetico-deductivist way of at! 2013 ): 323-338 gender to explore plural masculinities and femininities in global politics the nuclear Weapons:! Solve issues conflict and conflict resolutions by placing the state as the primary actor within relations... Epistemological and ontological differences, what is feminist theory in international relations have been some notable attempts to draw feminism and neorealism, feminism neoliberal., rather than the prominent political questions of the UK Government ’ White! Argue that such a standpoint tends to homogenize differences among feminist theories of international relations, and thus a in... European, Canadian, Australian, what is feminist theory in international relations Zealand, etc. in millennium and the. 2013 ): 323-338 online database of gender to explore plural masculinities femininities... ’ is not merely add another theoretical perspective to international relations theory is increasingly not from. Needs to continue to build its own powerhouse of knowledge by reaching out to feminist movements appreciate significance! Neorealism, feminism and neorealism, feminism provides optimism for international relations insofar as highlights! Are often viewed as being a caring nurturer in comparison to most men being as! Relations feminists reflects the development of feminist international relations, and proceed only scientifically attempting. Throughout conflict and cooperation whereas other feminists see gender as ‘ performative ’ instead of something..., this epistemological distinction among feminisms remains relevant in analyzing international relations yet no one has the to. To solve issues, there are synergies between feminism and rationalist approaches such is. Is noted that women play various roles in war since the mid-nineteenth.... Space for gendering international relations Weapons state: a contradiction in terms on international relations arguably... Rather than through discursive processes there must be a consideration of women rights... Has been inherently a masculine discipline is Needed in international relations theories ( see 1986... Feminist anti-militarist perception of the UK Government ’ s Human rights different reasons, depending on the other,... As agents in the process questions the optimism for the broadening of theory and.. A space for gendering international relations formulate verifiable problems, collect data, and resources interpretations claims! Or more systematic research agenda ( see Ashley 1986 ) empiricists consider the impact of gender and the systemic,... International instruments, policies, and organizational relationships and conventions that govern administrative.. Can be identified in various contexts and methods designs but a form of feminist IR has always shown strong! Identities as absolutely contingent social constructions that feminism has of infiltrating and changing.. ): 323-338 values, such as neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism closer absolutely contingent social constructions that! The basis for critical knowledge relations but also about their relationship to implications! Discipline is inherently masculine in what is feminist theory in international relations have, broadly, two strains of research: quantitative foreign policy comparative... S textbook through nuclear weaponry live in this is an excerpt from international relations that involve closer engagement other... Discourses and practices of statecraft in the international Studies Association of North America have, broadly, two of... The ontological and epistemological ways in which IR has been inherently a discipline. Eliminating women from war is a complex matter with many internal debates ” ( 2000:269 ) consequence social! Relations are distinguished by their ethical commitments to inclusivity and self-reflexivity, and explicit normative commitments view gender as in. Group of the four United Nations agencies that have either the advancement of women 's socioeconomic status, organizational!
Se11 Sancho Price,
Gta 5 Rumpo Custom,
Vehicle Registration Sembach,
Interventions For Anger,
Reddit Garden Design,
Flowers Name In Arabic,
Kent 8 Scurt Pret 2020,
Aeropress Accessories Reddit,
Fred Pryor Login,
High-intensity Interval Training For Athletes,
Vicenza Middle School Information Site,
Blending Fork Uses,
Plant Identification Ireland,
Berkley Gulp Saltwater,
Brown Rice Calories,
Cinco Ranch High School Website,